Mar 16

Mind Control – Brain Scans That Will Read Your Thoughts.


Brain scans allow researchers to know exactly what a person is imagining, according to scientists decoding images directly from the brain and saying that with more studies, this new technology could help "treat" people. Human rights abuses involving mind control, however, are more advanced and common than the public is aware, although painfully revealed by torture victims, including many self-identified targeted individuals such as Bhutan's Tek Nath Rizal.

"Researchers have been able to put together what numbers people have seen, the memory a person is recalling, and even reconstruct videos of what a person has watched," Business Insider reports.
"This is the first study to show that we can decode what people are imagining," said Cornell University cognitive neuroscientist Nathan Spreng this week.

"We are trying to understand the physical mechanisms that allow us to have an inner world, and a part of that is how we represent other people in our mind."

All the better to target and torture you with, my dear

Implications of this research regarding mind control, neuroweaponry, targeted individuals and "interrogation" or torture are staggering.

Further research could help diagnose "diseases" and help "treat" disorders, the Cornell researchers say.
"It turns out that the history of neuroscience is revealing significant new evidence that such weapons may already be developed," states human rights advocate Cheryl Welsh. "Just one example of many illustrates the point. Experts agree that understanding, communicating and controlling the brain is a futuristic capability that has some similarities with a radio receiver which can transmit and receive radio waves."

Welsh, director of Mind Justice.org, writes:
To develop neuroweapons with such capabilities requires information age science of semiconductors, solid state physics and bioelectronics, which is the application of electronics science to biology--including the brain. Information age science took off in the 1940s and led to science discoveries such as transistor radios, computers, "human transistors" and much more. Notably, the bioelectronics and 'human transistors' research has been extended and has never been disproven. Nevertheless, this promising area of research remains obscure and at a rudimentary level of development. With a look back, two newspaper articles now illustrate some of the reasons why. 

First, the New York Post-Standard Sunday Magazine, June 30, 1963 newspaper reported on the start of the promising career of Robert O. Becker, a bioelectronics researcher. Moreover, according to a 1985 BBC documentary and a 2010 book, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) considered Becker's bioelectronics research to be reliable enough to depend on for national security purposes. In the 1960's, the CIA consulted with Becker about the possible use of Soviet bioelectronic weapons on U.S. fighter pilots shot down over the former U.S.S.R.

Welsh notes that almost 20 years later, Becker's career was 'short-circuited by the establishment,' according to the Syracuse Herald-American on February 15, 1981. 

Becker said his research was being derailed by several U.S. government interests due to his speaking publicly about possible health risks of related technologies.

"Furthermore, in the following 10 years, Becker went public by writing two books that described the U.S. national security establishment and its controlling interest and monopoly over this area of research since at least the 1960s," Welsh writes.

Welsh recommends reading Torture, Killing Me Softly, a 2009 book by Tek Nath Rizal.
Rizal alleges government mind control torture with secret electromagnetic radiation (EMR) mind control weapons.  

Rizal was a prominent government consultant to Bhutan in South Asian before exposing corruption in high places.

He became a popular political figure and internationally recognized human rights activist.
"His (Rizal's) book is about his experience of several years of imprisonment in Bhutan with an emphasis on the EMR mind control torture," Welsh writes. "The U.S. Department of State and Amnesty International regarded Rizal as a political prisoner and won his release from prison.

"Rizal has written several books, some of which included his accounts of mind control torture." 

Welsh says, "For the first time, a variety of medical, government and military professionals publicly acknowledge secret EMR mind control weapons for interrogation and torture in prisons and on POWs, prisoners of war."

She also asserts, "The U.S. and other major governments have harnessed science and technology to develop secret electromagnetic radiation (EMR) mind control weapons for intelligence purposes, for interrogation and torture, and for neutralizing the enemy without killing."

Welsh authored a review of the book including two lists for a revealing comparison: 1) EMR mind control technologies tracked by the UN and human rights groups since the 1950s, and 2) High profile cases similar to the case of Tek Nath Rizal.

She notes other reviews about Rizal's book:
"We owe thanks to Cheryl Welsh and her colleagues for their pioneering efforts to penetrate government deception through the phenomenology of self-identified victims of neuroweapons," Jean Maria Arrigo, PhDwrote about Welsh in 2008.
Arrigo is an independent social psychologist and oral historian whose work gives m
oral voice to military and intelligence professionals. (See, for example, Arrigo, J.M & Wagner, R. (2007). Torture Is for Amateurs: A Meeting of Psychologists and Military Interrogators. [Special issue]. Peace and Conflict, 11 (4).)
More Information on mind control, including news services and links to reviews by Cheryl Welsh, is available on her website, Mind Justice.

Mind Justice, according to its website, is a human rights group working for rights and protections of mental integrity and freedom from new technologies and weapons that target the mind and nervous system.

Mar 16

Mind Control – Brain Scans That Will Read Your Thoughts.


Brain scans allow researchers to know exactly what a person is imagining, according to scientists decoding images directly from the brain and saying that with more studies, this new technology could help "treat" people. Human rights abuses involving mind control, however, are more advanced and common than the public is aware, although painfully revealed by torture victims, including many self-identified targeted individuals such as Bhutan's Tek Nath Rizal.

"Researchers have been able to put together what numbers people have seen, the memory a person is recalling, and even reconstruct videos of what a person has watched," Business Insider reports.
"This is the first study to show that we can decode what people are imagining," said Cornell University cognitive neuroscientist Nathan Spreng this week.

"We are trying to understand the physical mechanisms that allow us to have an inner world, and a part of that is how we represent other people in our mind."

All the better to target and torture you with, my dear

Implications of this research regarding mind control, neuroweaponry, targeted individuals and "interrogation" or torture are staggering.

Further research could help diagnose "diseases" and help "treat" disorders, the Cornell researchers say.
"It turns out that the history of neuroscience is revealing significant new evidence that such weapons may already be developed," states human rights advocate Cheryl Welsh. "Just one example of many illustrates the point. Experts agree that understanding, communicating and controlling the brain is a futuristic capability that has some similarities with a radio receiver which can transmit and receive radio waves."

Welsh, director of Mind Justice.org, writes:
To develop neuroweapons with such capabilities requires information age science of semiconductors, solid state physics and bioelectronics, which is the application of electronics science to biology--including the brain. Information age science took off in the 1940s and led to science discoveries such as transistor radios, computers, "human transistors" and much more. Notably, the bioelectronics and 'human transistors' research has been extended and has never been disproven. Nevertheless, this promising area of research remains obscure and at a rudimentary level of development. With a look back, two newspaper articles now illustrate some of the reasons why. 

First, the New York Post-Standard Sunday Magazine, June 30, 1963 newspaper reported on the start of the promising career of Robert O. Becker, a bioelectronics researcher. Moreover, according to a 1985 BBC documentary and a 2010 book, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) considered Becker's bioelectronics research to be reliable enough to depend on for national security purposes. In the 1960's, the CIA consulted with Becker about the possible use of Soviet bioelectronic weapons on U.S. fighter pilots shot down over the former U.S.S.R.

Welsh notes that almost 20 years later, Becker's career was 'short-circuited by the establishment,' according to the Syracuse Herald-American on February 15, 1981. 

Becker said his research was being derailed by several U.S. government interests due to his speaking publicly about possible health risks of related technologies.

"Furthermore, in the following 10 years, Becker went public by writing two books that described the U.S. national security establishment and its controlling interest and monopoly over this area of research since at least the 1960s," Welsh writes.

Welsh recommends reading Torture, Killing Me Softly, a 2009 book by Tek Nath Rizal.
Rizal alleges government mind control torture with secret electromagnetic radiation (EMR) mind control weapons.  

Rizal was a prominent government consultant to Bhutan in South Asian before exposing corruption in high places.

He became a popular political figure and internationally recognized human rights activist.
"His (Rizal's) book is about his experience of several years of imprisonment in Bhutan with an emphasis on the EMR mind control torture," Welsh writes. "The U.S. Department of State and Amnesty International regarded Rizal as a political prisoner and won his release from prison.

"Rizal has written several books, some of which included his accounts of mind control torture." 

Welsh says, "For the first time, a variety of medical, government and military professionals publicly acknowledge secret EMR mind control weapons for interrogation and torture in prisons and on POWs, prisoners of war."

She also asserts, "The U.S. and other major governments have harnessed science and technology to develop secret electromagnetic radiation (EMR) mind control weapons for intelligence purposes, for interrogation and torture, and for neutralizing the enemy without killing."

Welsh authored a review of the book including two lists for a revealing comparison: 1) EMR mind control technologies tracked by the UN and human rights groups since the 1950s, and 2) High profile cases similar to the case of Tek Nath Rizal.

She notes other reviews about Rizal's book:
"We owe thanks to Cheryl Welsh and her colleagues for their pioneering efforts to penetrate government deception through the phenomenology of self-identified victims of neuroweapons," Jean Maria Arrigo, PhDwrote about Welsh in 2008.
Arrigo is an independent social psychologist and oral historian whose work gives m
oral voice to military and intelligence professionals. (See, for example, Arrigo, J.M & Wagner, R. (2007). Torture Is for Amateurs: A Meeting of Psychologists and Military Interrogators. [Special issue]. Peace and Conflict, 11 (4).)
More Information on mind control, including news services and links to reviews by Cheryl Welsh, is available on her website, Mind Justice.

Mind Justice, according to its website, is a human rights group working for rights and protections of mental integrity and freedom from new technologies and weapons that target the mind and nervous system.

Feb 26

All the President’s Neuroscientists


President Obama's proposed Brain Activity Map Project could lead to cures for Alzheimer's, autism, and schizophrenia. But members of Congress should read the fine print when the $3 billion proposal hits their desks next month — because the project might also provide the first viable means of remotely controlling the human mind. 

Brain Map
Hulton Archive/Getty Images
A phrenological cross-section of a man's head, illustrating the idea that the brain processes thoughts in different locations according to their type, circa 1880.




In 1973, during a panel discussion on the ethics of brain surgery, a Yale neurophysiologist named Jose Delgado argued that the time was ripe for the widespread use of corrective neural implants. "The question," said Dr. Delgado, "rather than, What is man? should be, What kind of man are we going to construct?" Dr. Delgado was fond of publicity stunts, and had earlier used a remotely activated neural implant to stop a charging bull in its tracks.

My grandfather, Dr. William Beecher Scoville, was also on the panel. His career as a neurosurgeon had by that time straddled five decades, and he'd witnessed a variety of once-promising treatments, such as the lobotomy and other psychosurgeries, gain widespread acceptance before falling spectacularly from grace. His experiences in the operating room had taught him firsthand the dangers of tampering with things perhaps best left un-tampered with, and knocking out an animal with the push of a button did not strike him as a novelty that would necessarily lead to the betterment of mankind. He waited for his younger colleague to finish, then responded. 

"With all due respect to Dr. Delgado," he said, "I work almost entirely in humans, and we are more aware of the disastrous effects that sometimes occur in neurosurgery." 

I thought about this exchange as I was reading up on President Obama's hugely ambitious, quite expensive, and yet-to-be-officially-announced Brain Activity Map Project. The first public hint of the project came during last week's State of the Union address, when Obama, after noting that the federal government's investment in the Human Genome Project during the eighties and nineties had led to a 140-fold return on investment, declared that "today our scientists are mapping the human brain," and that "now is the time to reach a level of research and development not seen since the space race." 

Since then, more details have begun to trickle out. The project, which is slated to cost north of $3 billion, is already well into its planning stages, and funding for it will probably be part of next month's federal budget proposal. A handful of scientists have come forward and revealed that they have been instrumental in the project's planning. Interestingly, most of these same scientists collaborated last year on an article in the academic journal Neuron. The article is called, "The Brain Activity Map Project and the Challenge of Functional Connectomics." There's every reason to believe that this article is a template for the soon-to-be-unveiled initiative. As such, it's worth a close read.
It begins by reiterating the ancient and confounding truth that the brain is a stubbornly opaque beast. Even with all the imaging advances of recent decades— EEGs to CTs to fMRIs to PETs and beyond — we still lack the tools to directly and meaningfully observe the fundamental neural circuitry that underpins whatever a particular brain is doing at any given moment. But there is hope on the horizon. A number of promising tools—the most promising ones still firmly in the theoretical stage of development—may soon enable us to document the activities of countless live neurons in real-time, ultimately allowing us to reconstruct "the full record of neural activity across complete neural circuits." This could offer better ways of understanding exactly how schizophrenic or autistic or other atypical brains differ from normal ones, and perhaps suggest strategies for righting them.

About halfway through the paper, the authors lay out a rough roadmap. Within five years, using existing technologies, they believe they could chart a complete functional map of a tiny-brained — it's got 302 neurons, as compared to your roughly 86 billion — nematode called C. elegans, and within ten years they believe they could do the same with the somewhat bigger-brained drosophilia fruitfly. But Obama isn't dropping space race comparisons because he thinks we have a desperate need to grok the brains of worms and bugs. The heart of the project, its final frontier, is the human brain. Within fifteen years, its planners write, they will be ready to "proceed toward primates," and then add that "we do not exclude the extension of the BAM Project to humans."

And here's where things get sketchy. The technologies required to map the brains of lower life forms won't cut it with us. Our brains are too big, too complicated. While nanoprobes and other extensions of existing technology might get us part of the way, in order to get deep inside we'll have to invent an entirely new class of what the Neuron paper calls Wireless and Synthetic Biology Approaches. "We think that it will ultimately become feasible to deploy small wireless microcircuits, untethered in living brains, for direct monitoring of neuronal activity," the paper's authors write. A little later, they add that "potential options for a human BAM Project include wireless electronics, safely and transiently introducing engineered cells to make tight (transient) junctions with neurons for recording and possibly programmable stimulation, or a combination of these approaches."

Two things should leap out from reading the above quote. First, the redundant and distracting use of the words "transient" and "transiently," a heavy-handed way to assure us that these untethered, internal brain monitors don't have to be permanent, trust us. Second, note the reference to "possibly programmable stimulation." Let's be clear about what that means: These probes they envision injecting into human brains will not only be able to record the firing of vast networks of individual neurons, but will possibly be able to control the firing of those individual neurons as well. Later in the paper, they come back to a variant of this same point, writing that they anticipate the project will foster the "development of novel devices and strategies for fine control brain stimulation."

Of course, you could argue that these neuronal stimulators would just be more highly tuned versions of the implanted brain electrodes that the FDA already approves for the treatment of certain conditions like Parkinson's disease. There's a huge difference, though. It's one thing to give a coarse and leveling shock to a relatively huge swath of dysfunctional brain tissue. It's something else altogether to be able to wirelessly and independently stimulate every single neuron in the insanely complex intertwined circuits that make up the human brain. The Brain Activity Map Project wants to understand how our brains do what it is that they do, but it just so happens that the technology the project will develop to gain this understanding could also be used to make our brains do whatever they want. Wirelessly. From a distance. The truth is, most major scientific breakthroughs, like the human minds that give birth to them, have light and dark sides. And some of those dark sides are darker than others.

The project's leaders are not blind to this darkness. At the end of the paper, they note that the project has "potential ethical ramifications," and that these include "issues of mind-control." To assuage concerns about these ramifications, they write, it's going to be up to the scientists participating in the project to engage "diverse sets of stakeholders and the lay public early and thoughtfully." Speaking of those stakeholders, is it any surprise that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency will reportedly be involved, or that Google and Microsoft have already taken part in some of the preparatory groundwork?

I'm not saying that the President's brain-mapping project is a bad idea. As he put it in his State of the Union address, it could help "unlock the answers to Alzheimer's," among other worthy goals. But I do think it's worth considering that this same project is also a DARPA-associated endeavor that could lead to the development of the first truly sci-fi caliber mind-control technology.

When Obama mentioned the statistics about the huge return on investment provided by the Human Genome Project, he was borrowing from a 2010 study that tried to break down the various ways that project had rippled through the American economy. Companies of all sorts, from ones trying to develop new cancer drugs to ones promising to help you flesh out your family tree, have ridden the genomics wave. Looking towards the future, if the Brain Activity Map Project survives the upcoming budget debate (and perhaps a much-needed ethical debate), you've got to wonder what sorts of companies will benefit from its success.

I'm going long on tinfoil.

Feb 26

All the President’s Neuroscientists


President Obama's proposed Brain Activity Map Project could lead to cures for Alzheimer's, autism, and schizophrenia. But members of Congress should read the fine print when the $3 billion proposal hits their desks next month — because the project might also provide the first viable means of remotely controlling the human mind. 

Brain Map
Hulton Archive/Getty Images
A phrenological cross-section of a man's head, illustrating the idea that the brain processes thoughts in different locations according to their type, circa 1880.




In 1973, during a panel discussion on the ethics of brain surgery, a Yale neurophysiologist named Jose Delgado argued that the time was ripe for the widespread use of corrective neural implants. "The question," said Dr. Delgado, "rather than, What is man? should be, What kind of man are we going to construct?" Dr. Delgado was fond of publicity stunts, and had earlier used a remotely activated neural implant to stop a charging bull in its tracks.

My grandfather, Dr. William Beecher Scoville, was also on the panel. His career as a neurosurgeon had by that time straddled five decades, and he'd witnessed a variety of once-promising treatments, such as the lobotomy and other psychosurgeries, gain widespread acceptance before falling spectacularly from grace. His experiences in the operating room had taught him firsthand the dangers of tampering with things perhaps best left un-tampered with, and knocking out an animal with the push of a button did not strike him as a novelty that would necessarily lead to the betterment of mankind. He waited for his younger colleague to finish, then responded. 

"With all due respect to Dr. Delgado," he said, "I work almost entirely in humans, and we are more aware of the disastrous effects that sometimes occur in neurosurgery." 

I thought about this exchange as I was reading up on President Obama's hugely ambitious, quite expensive, and yet-to-be-officially-announced Brain Activity Map Project. The first public hint of the project came during last week's State of the Union address, when Obama, after noting that the federal government's investment in the Human Genome Project during the eighties and nineties had led to a 140-fold return on investment, declared that "today our scientists are mapping the human brain," and that "now is the time to reach a level of research and development not seen since the space race." 

Since then, more details have begun to trickle out. The project, which is slated to cost north of $3 billion, is already well into its planning stages, and funding for it will probably be part of next month's federal budget proposal. A handful of scientists have come forward and revealed that they have been instrumental in the project's planning. Interestingly, most of these same scientists collaborated last year on an article in the academic journal Neuron. The article is called, "The Brain Activity Map Project and the Challenge of Functional Connectomics." There's every reason to believe that this article is a template for the soon-to-be-unveiled initiative. As such, it's worth a close read.
It begins by reiterating the ancient and confounding truth that the brain is a stubbornly opaque beast. Even with all the imaging advances of recent decades— EEGs to CTs to fMRIs to PETs and beyond — we still lack the tools to directly and meaningfully observe the fundamental neural circuitry that underpins whatever a particular brain is doing at any given moment. But there is hope on the horizon. A number of promising tools—the most promising ones still firmly in the theoretical stage of development—may soon enable us to document the activities of countless live neurons in real-time, ultimately allowing us to reconstruct "the full record of neural activity across complete neural circuits." This could offer better ways of understanding exactly how schizophrenic or autistic or other atypical brains differ from normal ones, and perhaps suggest strategies for righting them.

About halfway through the paper, the authors lay out a rough roadmap. Within five years, using existing technologies, they believe they could chart a complete functional map of a tiny-brained — it's got 302 neurons, as compared to your roughly 86 billion — nematode called C. elegans, and within ten years they believe they could do the same with the somewhat bigger-brained drosophilia fruitfly. But Obama isn't dropping space race comparisons because he thinks we have a desperate need to grok the brains of worms and bugs. The heart of the project, its final frontier, is the human brain. Within fifteen years, its planners write, they will be ready to "proceed toward primates," and then add that "we do not exclude the extension of the BAM Project to humans."

And here's where things get sketchy. The technologies required to map the brains of lower life forms won't cut it with us. Our brains are too big, too complicated. While nanoprobes and other extensions of existing technology might get us part of the way, in order to get deep inside we'll have to invent an entirely new class of what the Neuron paper calls Wireless and Synthetic Biology Approaches. "We think that it will ultimately become feasible to deploy small wireless microcircuits, untethered in living brains, for direct monitoring of neuronal activity," the paper's authors write. A little later, they add that "potential options for a human BAM Project include wireless electronics, safely and transiently introducing engineered cells to make tight (transient) junctions with neurons for recording and possibly programmable stimulation, or a combination of these approaches."

Two things should leap out from reading the above quote. First, the redundant and distracting use of the words "transient" and "transiently," a heavy-handed way to assure us that these untethered, internal brain monitors don't have to be permanent, trust us. Second, note the reference to "possibly programmable stimulation." Let's be clear about what that means: These probes they envision injecting into human brains will not only be able to record the firing of vast networks of individual neurons, but will possibly be able to control the firing of those individual neurons as well. Later in the paper, they come back to a variant of this same point, writing that they anticipate the project will foster the "development of novel devices and strategies for fine control brain stimulation."

Of course, you could argue that these neuronal stimulators would just be more highly tuned versions of the implanted brain electrodes that the FDA already approves for the treatment of certain conditions like Parkinson's disease. There's a huge difference, though. It's one thing to give a coarse and leveling shock to a relatively huge swath of dysfunctional brain tissue. It's something else altogether to be able to wirelessly and independently stimulate every single neuron in the insanely complex intertwined circuits that make up the human brain. The Brain Activity Map Project wants to understand how our brains do what it is that they do, but it just so happens that the technology the project will develop to gain this understanding could also be used to make our brains do whatever they want. Wirelessly. From a distance. The truth is, most major scientific breakthroughs, like the human minds that give birth to them, have light and dark sides. And some of those dark sides are darker than others.

The project's leaders are not blind to this darkness. At the end of the paper, they note that the project has "potential ethical ramifications," and that these include "issues of mind-control." To assuage concerns about these ramifications, they write, it's going to be up to the scientists participating in the project to engage "diverse sets of stakeholders and the lay public early and thoughtfully." Speaking of those stakeholders, is it any surprise that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency will reportedly be involved, or that Google and Microsoft have already taken part in some of the preparatory groundwork?

I'm not saying that the President's brain-mapping project is a bad idea. As he put it in his State of the Union address, it could help "unlock the answers to Alzheimer's," among other worthy goals. But I do think it's worth considering that this same project is also a DARPA-associated endeavor that could lead to the development of the first truly sci-fi caliber mind-control technology.

When Obama mentioned the statistics about the huge return on investment provided by the Human Genome Project, he was borrowing from a 2010 study that tried to break down the various ways that project had rippled through the American economy. Companies of all sorts, from ones trying to develop new cancer drugs to ones promising to help you flesh out your family tree, have ridden the genomics wave. Looking towards the future, if the Brain Activity Map Project survives the upcoming budget debate (and perhaps a much-needed ethical debate), you've got to wonder what sorts of companies will benefit from its success.

I'm going long on tinfoil.

Feb 24

Quantum based Mind Control now a Reality and is causing global genocide

The mechanism behind mind control of the USA- Quantum based Mind Control now a Reality and is causing global genocide- for now decades in the Holy Land, and Africa, now taking place in the USA and Central Europe- It must be exposed, stopped, shut down. It is not just in cell towers, but in the Weaponized power grid.. (internet search weaponized power grid.. DO NOT USE GOOGLE- ) , It is in the US communication satellites that were using russian and chinese made chips.. Remember EPROM where there was a clear plastic window and chips could be reprogrammed with infa red..) and it is in the TV and Radio stations in the USA. it is in the satellite TV dishes, IT IS IN WIFI. and when the digital conversion took place- the FCC sold those freed up wavelenths to global terrorists... And the tech is in the household appliances.. we buy made in china.. and South Korea.. Bulgaria took over manufacture of US appliances in the 1990's soon after the Berlin Wall fell.. so europe is getting this tech too in their TOYS.. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1729714964216&set=a.128... Actually, it's been a reality since before anyone can remember, Now, after about 70 years of suppression, the truth about quantum entanglement conveying classical information and charge is being released. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4706689.html
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4706689.pdf This is the technology behind a global surveillance infrastructure based on "TEMPEST 3" technology — the remote reading and writing of electrical circuitry using advanced particle physics. The danger and threat of electromagnetic weapons was realized by the US Dept of Defense in 1985- but actually the threat has been since 1927. Much of the threat is by Soviets and the fact they have been 10 years ahead in mind control torture technology of the USA- to the degree where the space satellites for US dept of defense communication satellite chips were made by Russia and China for many of the satellites put up by the space shuttle missions.- and the chips could be re-programmed- and taken over by the Communists that would endanger the lives of the entire world using the USA as the Patsy Please watch this in FULL and "SAVE AS" make copies of this very important documentary on MIND CONTROL AND DIRECTED ENERGY weapons from 1985  

Feb 24

Quantum based Mind Control now a Reality and is causing global genocide

The mechanism behind mind control of the USA- Quantum based Mind Control now a Reality and is causing global genocide- for now decades in the Holy Land, and Africa, now taking place in the USA and Central Europe- It must be exposed, stopped, shut down. It is not just in cell towers, but in the Weaponized power grid.. (internet search weaponized power grid.. DO NOT USE GOOGLE- ) , It is in the US communication satellites that were using russian and chinese made chips.. Remember EPROM where there was a clear plastic window and chips could be reprogrammed with infa red..) and it is in the TV and Radio stations in the USA. it is in the satellite TV dishes, IT IS IN WIFI. and when the digital conversion took place- the FCC sold those freed up wavelenths to global terrorists... And the tech is in the household appliances.. we buy made in china.. and South Korea.. Bulgaria took over manufacture of US appliances in the 1990's soon after the Berlin Wall fell.. so europe is getting this tech too in their TOYS.. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1729714964216&set=a.128... Actually, it's been a reality since before anyone can remember, Now, after about 70 years of suppression, the truth about quantum entanglement conveying classical information and charge is being released. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4706689.html
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4706689.pdf This is the technology behind a global surveillance infrastructure based on "TEMPEST 3" technology — the remote reading and writing of electrical circuitry using advanced particle physics. The danger and threat of electromagnetic weapons was realized by the US Dept of Defense in 1985- but actually the threat has been since 1927. Much of the threat is by Soviets and the fact they have been 10 years ahead in mind control torture technology of the USA- to the degree where the space satellites for US dept of defense communication satellite chips were made by Russia and China for many of the satellites put up by the space shuttle missions.- and the chips could be re-programmed- and taken over by the Communists that would endanger the lives of the entire world using the USA as the Patsy Please watch this in FULL and "SAVE AS" make copies of this very important documentary on MIND CONTROL AND DIRECTED ENERGY weapons from 1985  

Feb 24

Quantum based Mind Control now a Reality and is causing global genocide

The mechanism behind mind control of the USA- Quantum based Mind Control now a Reality and is causing global genocide- for now decades in the Holy Land, and Africa, now taking place in the USA and Central Europe- It must be exposed, stopped, shut down. It is not just in cell towers, but in the Weaponized power grid.. (internet search weaponized power grid.. DO NOT USE GOOGLE- ) , It is in the US communication satellites that were using russian and chinese made chips.. Remember EPROM where there was a clear plastic window and chips could be reprogrammed with infa red..) and it is in the TV and Radio stations in the USA. it is in the satellite TV dishes, IT IS IN WIFI. and when the digital conversion took place- the FCC sold those freed up wavelenths to global terrorists... And the tech is in the household appliances.. we buy made in china.. and South Korea.. Bulgaria took over manufacture of US appliances in the 1990's soon after the Berlin Wall fell.. so europe is getting this tech too in their TOYS.. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1729714964216&set=a.128... Actually, it's been a reality since before anyone can remember, Now, after about 70 years of suppression, the truth about quantum entanglement conveying classical information and charge is being released. http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4706689.html
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/4706689.pdf This is the technology behind a global surveillance infrastructure based on "TEMPEST 3" technology — the remote reading and writing of electrical circuitry using advanced particle physics. The danger and threat of electromagnetic weapons was realized by the US Dept of Defense in 1985- but actually the threat has been since 1927. Much of the threat is by Soviets and the fact they have been 10 years ahead in mind control torture technology of the USA- to the degree where the space satellites for US dept of defense communication satellite chips were made by Russia and China for many of the satellites put up by the space shuttle missions.- and the chips could be re-programmed- and taken over by the Communists that would endanger the lives of the entire world using the USA as the Patsy Please watch this in FULL and "SAVE AS" make copies of this very important documentary on MIND CONTROL AND DIRECTED ENERGY weapons from 1985  

Feb 23

Learn Mind Control Techniques Within 20 Minutes


Mind Control



What is mind control?

Any form of manipulation over another persons emotional or mental state can be considered Mind Control. Persuading a person or group of people put their will aside in order to conform or follow yours. Think about this, we all use forms of mind control in our daily lives. You probably talked your friend to going to your favorite place for lunch, Or, maybe expressed unjust emotions in a conversation with some one, hoping to gear the out come.

You will be able to successfully use this techniques today!
How do I know this?Mind control is a part of human nature, We are all born with the ability and knowledge to control the will of another. In the same sense, we are all open to manipulation. Intention and Identification is what makes all the difference. Its what separates us from the sheep.

The “Physical” layer

Mind manipulation through a persons five senses. In order to understand this or any form of mind control, think about your home computer. With out your intervention a computer doest do much. If you take control of its “Senses”, your computer will preform the task's you ask of it. If you have a web cam with installed (learned) facial recognition, it can “see” you. A Mic and Voice recognition it can “hear” you. The mouse enables it to “feel” you. A keyboard and screen to communicate with you. Now there is specialized equipment that enables taste and smell but, we'll worry about that later. Access here is a 3 step processes A)You request attention. B)Confirmation of attention C)Access gained

Risk -being ignored, just try again
This analogy is very important, you must keep this in mind at all times. A persons five senses are key when it comes to manipulation.

The “Logical” layer

This is where understanding a bit of physiology or computer science may help. The Physical layer is means to the Logical layer of the mind. Once you are in range of some ones five senses and “have” their attention your able to access the Logic layer. Consider this the “processing” part of the mind. You feed information through the senses. They start processing it, thinking about what they are told, what they physically felt, smell, see, etc. Now we can use the “Logical” layer for various mind control techniques. Consider this the Persuading layer, you use logic in order to manipulate.

Risk- worst case, disregard of information or input

The “Emotional” Layer

As we travel deeper common limitations become easier to cross. With Access to the Emotional Layer Mind control Techniques become very effective. The Power of emotion is evident to every on. You need to detach your self from some ones emotions. Keeping your mind set in the Logical Layer. Maintaining control of your emotions and reactions is important, It is also difficult. You must reflect the right emotional response with out falling to that level.

Risk-Target stabilizes, an opposing response, proper input control can be regained

The Hyper-Arousal Layer

Known as Fight or Flight responses. Access to this layer of mind control removes all limitations. This also gives way to intimidate response. The targets attention, all senses and emotions will be controlled. Maintaining this level of Mind Control is difficult. Hyper-arousal only occurs under direct, clear and present stress. If the target is allowed to elevate from this layer control can be lost. If the Logical Layer takes hold after this layer has been implicated, Control is a complete loss.

Risk- If control is lost at this layer the amount of aggression directed toward you will be equal or greater then amount of simulated stress.

Example with break down:
You see someone approaching you (Physical Layer #A)
They get your attention(Physical Layer #B)
The person realizes this(Physical Layer #C)
The persons appears menacing (Logical Layer: Friend/Threat/Nether )
The person makes direct threats towards you (Emotional Layer Fear/Anger/Aggravation)
The Person pulls out a gun and starts shooting (Hyper-Arousal)
*Although this example is extreme, apply this to other situations.
-Security companies produce commercial using this protocol.
-News station use this to “Keep You Tuned”

How would you use this information to develop Mind Control Techniques

Identify Target, Gain Attention, logically Persuade into an emotional state, Trigger Hyper-Arousal
A Historical example of this simple mind controlling protocol and its incredible power can be seen in any religion.
  • Identify Target – Anyone that falls into a similar group.
  • Gain Attention – God said this!
  • logically Persuade into an emotional state – biblical stories
  • Trigger Hyper-Arousal – Follow or burn for eternity

The Mind Control Techniques used by cults and Goverments

Using the same technique Jim Jones developed a large cult following. He played on their logic keeping his followers under the emotional state of fear and dependence. The Hyper-Arousal layer was premeditated and ultimately lead to the largest mass suicide in global history. This level of Mind control is also used by media outlets.


How to control your mind

You must see any interaction with your senses as a potential intrusion. This sounds impossible, you cant live in a cave. Even if you did your senses will still function. So understand that you will never be 100% immune to mind control techniques. Its also important that you don't view “Mind Control” as evil, its not, its a basic human element. Its what groups us, builds community, keeps family together and kept you from dangers.

Now its also what made you spend a ton of cash on a LED TV.


So How to take and keep control of your mind

  • Be aware any sensory input will influence you. TV, Radio, Conversations, Pictures

  • Always keep a level head. There really aren't many things that require immediate reaction.
  • Sleep on it, then sleep on it again. Stress is the key to mind control.
  • Regulate your thoughts when taking “input”, keep a check of where the info is taking you
  • Regulate your emotions, just as thought. Are you being guided in a direction you would not be headed in normally.

Feb 23

Learn Mind Control Techniques Within 20 Minutes


Mind Control



What is mind control?

Any form of manipulation over another persons emotional or mental state can be considered Mind Control. Persuading a person or group of people put their will aside in order to conform or follow yours. Think about this, we all use forms of mind control in our daily lives. You probably talked your friend to going to your favorite place for lunch, Or, maybe expressed unjust emotions in a conversation with some one, hoping to gear the out come.

You will be able to successfully use this techniques today!
How do I know this?Mind control is a part of human nature, We are all born with the ability and knowledge to control the will of another. In the same sense, we are all open to manipulation. Intention and Identification is what makes all the difference. Its what separates us from the sheep.

The “Physical” layer

Mind manipulation through a persons five senses. In order to understand this or any form of mind control, think about your home computer. With out your intervention a computer doest do much. If you take control of its “Senses”, your computer will preform the task's you ask of it. If you have a web cam with installed (learned) facial recognition, it can “see” you. A Mic and Voice recognition it can “hear” you. The mouse enables it to “feel” you. A keyboard and screen to communicate with you. Now there is specialized equipment that enables taste and smell but, we'll worry about that later. Access here is a 3 step processes A)You request attention. B)Confirmation of attention C)Access gained

Risk -being ignored, just try again
This analogy is very important, you must keep this in mind at all times. A persons five senses are key when it comes to manipulation.

The “Logical” layer

This is where understanding a bit of physiology or computer science may help. The Physical layer is means to the Logical layer of the mind. Once you are in range of some ones five senses and “have” their attention your able to access the Logic layer. Consider this the “processing” part of the mind. You feed information through the senses. They start processing it, thinking about what they are told, what they physically felt, smell, see, etc. Now we can use the “Logical” layer for various mind control techniques. Consider this the Persuading layer, you use logic in order to manipulate.

Risk- worst case, disregard of information or input

The “Emotional” Layer

As we travel deeper common limitations become easier to cross. With Access to the Emotional Layer Mind control Techniques become very effective. The Power of emotion is evident to every on. You need to detach your self from some ones emotions. Keeping your mind set in the Logical Layer. Maintaining control of your emotions and reactions is important, It is also difficult. You must reflect the right emotional response with out falling to that level.

Risk-Target stabilizes, an opposing response, proper input control can be regained

The Hyper-Arousal Layer

Known as Fight or Flight responses. Access to this layer of mind control removes all limitations. This also gives way to intimidate response. The targets attention, all senses and emotions will be controlled. Maintaining this level of Mind Control is difficult. Hyper-arousal only occurs under direct, clear and present stress. If the target is allowed to elevate from this layer control can be lost. If the Logical Layer takes hold after this layer has been implicated, Control is a complete loss.

Risk- If control is lost at this layer the amount of aggression directed toward you will be equal or greater then amount of simulated stress.

Example with break down:
You see someone approaching you (Physical Layer #A)
They get your attention(Physical Layer #B)
The person realizes this(Physical Layer #C)
The persons appears menacing (Logical Layer: Friend/Threat/Nether )
The person makes direct threats towards you (Emotional Layer Fear/Anger/Aggravation)
The Person pulls out a gun and starts shooting (Hyper-Arousal)
*Although this example is extreme, apply this to other situations.
-Security companies produce commercial using this protocol.
-News station use this to “Keep You Tuned”

How would you use this information to develop Mind Control Techniques

Identify Target, Gain Attention, logically Persuade into an emotional state, Trigger Hyper-Arousal
A Historical example of this simple mind controlling protocol and its incredible power can be seen in any religion.
  • Identify Target – Anyone that falls into a similar group.
  • Gain Attention – God said this!
  • logically Persuade into an emotional state – biblical stories
  • Trigger Hyper-Arousal – Follow or burn for eternity

The Mind Control Techniques used by cults and Goverments

Using the same technique Jim Jones developed a large cult following. He played on their logic keeping his followers under the emotional state of fear and dependence. The Hyper-Arousal layer was premeditated and ultimately lead to the largest mass suicide in global history. This level of Mind control is also used by media outlets.


How to control your mind

You must see any interaction with your senses as a potential intrusion. This sounds impossible, you cant live in a cave. Even if you did your senses will still function. So understand that you will never be 100% immune to mind control techniques. Its also important that you don't view “Mind Control” as evil, its not, its a basic human element. Its what groups us, builds community, keeps family together and kept you from dangers.

Now its also what made you spend a ton of cash on a LED TV.


So How to take and keep control of your mind

  • Be aware any sensory input will influence you. TV, Radio, Conversations, Pictures

  • Always keep a level head. There really aren't many things that require immediate reaction.
  • Sleep on it, then sleep on it again. Stress is the key to mind control.
  • Regulate your thoughts when taking “input”, keep a check of where the info is taking you
  • Regulate your emotions, just as thought. Are you being guided in a direction you would not be headed in normally.

Feb 22

Mind Control


"(Gaaaasp) Are those drones?!" my 11-year-old daughter asked as a formation of fighter jets flicked on giant screens while the national anthem played before a girls college basketball game we attended last month.

Whether it's through sporting events, politics, news or even entertainment (like NBC's reality show "Stars Earn Stripes"), we are constantly being bombarded by pro-war propaganda, paving the way for continued American imperialistic military engagements around the world  (of late: Afghanistan, Chad, Iraq, Jordan, Libya, Mali, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Turkey, Uganda and Yemen).

Recent news that such psychological indoctrination is getting cranked up a few decibels indicates more of the same is in the pipeline.

According to the latest U.S. Army field manual released publicly in January, public relations (which has always been a part of the military) will now be front and center. New "Inform and Influence Activities" have been added to traditional war responsibilities to keep not only troops and Americans aware of what is going but also to brainwash foreign audiences' into supporting U.S military exploits (like the ever expanding War on Terror) in their own lands by working through fifth columnists.

Already, the military-industrial-complex has co-opted mass media--one of the most powerful tools used to manipulate the masses--throughout Muslim lands. Two glaring examples are Western puppet Qatar's Al-Jazeera (Former Al-Jazeera Germany correspondent Aktham Suliman: "We at Al-Jazeera were always proud to say: 'We're financed by Qatar, but the state never interferes with our reporting.' Now we suddenly find ourselves in a situation in which our reporting is precisely aligned with Qatari foreign policy.") and Pakistan's Geo News, which was launched by the help of former U.S. Navy officer David Hazinski of Intelligent Media Consultants.

Indeed, more journalists are being prepared to continue this work. USAID Pakistan and National Geographic Society last fall sponsored a "photo camp" for 15 young aspiring journalists from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), which is, ironically, the target of most U.S. drone strikes in that country.

"This USAID-funded photo camp is yet another expression of the United States' commitment to ensuring that the citizens of Pakistan are well informed about the events and policies that affect their daily lives," according to Jock Conly, USAID Mission Director.

Muslims as well as all others struggling to free themselves from imperialist rule must protect themselves from manipulation by: tuning them out.

God: “O Believers, if an unrighteous person comes to you with information, you should verify it or else you might inflict harm on a people in ignorance and then end up regretting what you have done.” (Quran 49: 6)

A study of Islamic history reveals how destructive false propaganda can be in society, especially when it comes from the mouth of "Muslims."

Muawiya, who vehemently opposed the rule of fourth caliph Ali, spread so many lies about Ali from the pulpits that when Ali was martyred in a mosque, people asked: "What was Ali doing in a mosque?" (Even today imperialist/Zionist influence over mosques can be heard loud and clear when imams laud U.S. military operations in Libya and pray for Western-backed rebels in Syria.)

To win the war of words, Muslims must take the lead in countering the lies with the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

"Ultimately, all media is propaganda, and that's not necessarily a bad thing as long as the propaganda corresponds with the truth," says Roshan Muhammad Salih, former head of news in London for Tehran-based Press TV.  After Press TV was censored off the air in Europe, America and the Middle East last month, Iran announced it will launch three of its own telecom satellites in the next five years.

In America, Imam Abdul Alim Musa of Masjid Al-Islam in Washington is doing his part by heading the Islamic Institute of Counter Zionist American Psychological Warfare and urging people to promote truth, peace and justice by calling others to God, performing righteous deeds and cultivating friendships with fellow Americans.

"We do not call you to any kind of physical or military confrontation in America," Musa says. "We only ask that you stand up for justice and fair play."

In fact, even one person can make a difference in the battle for truth. While Muawiya succeeded in spreading lies about Ali, when Muawiya's son Yazid tried to do the same against Ali's son Hussain (who gave up his life fighting against the oppression of Yazid), Zainab, daughter of Ali, single-handedly countered the lies by exposing the truth, which has been passed down and inspired people of conscience from generation to generation.

Zainab to the oppressors: "O you deceivers!...You have done that which could tear down the skies, open the earth, and make the mountains vanish...Indeed you have done the ugliest, the most grievous and gruesome deed!"

Older posts «

Switch to our mobile site